Impact of educational leadership on job satisfaction and academic performance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14292056

Keywords:

educational leadership, job satisfaction, academic performance

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of educational leadership on job satisfaction and academic performance from the perspective of 180 teachers in basic and secondary education institutions. Using a mixed-methods approach, surveys and interviews were conducted to identify the most valued leadership styles. The results show that transformational and distributed leadership styles have a positive correlation with teacher satisfaction and student performance. Conversely, autocratic and laissez-faire leadership styles are associated with lower levels of satisfaction and performance. It is concluded that the implementation of participatory and collaborative leadership is key to improving educational quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., y Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621

Bass, B. M., y Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

Day, C., y Sammons, P. (2016). Successful school leadership. Education Development Trust. https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/EducationDevelopmentTrust/files/64/64e0a7b9-0b5a-4d35-9f3a-73975f71c6cd.pdf

Day, C., Gu, Q., y Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Harris, A. (2009). Distributed Leadership: Different Perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9737-9

Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., y Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven Strong Claims about Successful School Leadership. National College for School Leadership. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6967/1/download%3Fid%3D17387&filename%3Dseven-claims-about-successful-school-leadership.pdf

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., y Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., y Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Published

2024-12-06

How to Cite

Impact of educational leadership on job satisfaction and academic performance. (2024). InveCom Journal, 5(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14292056

Most read articles by the same author(s)