Digital tools and scientific competencies: A predictive model using PLS-SEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23608222

Keywords:

digital competence, research, educational technology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of digital tools on the development of scientific competencies among students in regular basic education. A quantitative, basic research approach with a causal-correlational design was adopted. The sample, selected through convenience sampling, consisted of 484 teachers from East Lima. Data analysis was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicated that the formative variables—technological access and proficiency, pedagogical integration and innovation, and digital collaboration—accounted for 56.6% of the use of digital tools. Among these, digital collaboration showed the highest correlation (β = 0.351; p < 0.05). Furthermore, it was observed that the use of digital tools, as well as inquiry and experimentation, were related to teaching competencies (β = −0.043; p < 0.05), which acted as moderating variables. Notably, there was a substantial relationship between the use of digital tools and inquiry and experimentation (β = 0.724; p < 0.05), which was enhanced by teaching competencies (β = 0.206; p < 0.05). The predictive model demonstrated acceptable fit indices (SRMR = 0.059; NFI = 0.777), supporting its validity. Consequently, it is recommended to strengthen technological access and proficiency, pedagogical integration and innovation, and digital collaboration, prioritizing initiatives that enhance the use of digital tools in the development of scientific competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barreras, Á., Moreno-Mediavilla, D., Gómez, R., & Palacios, A. (2026). Factors influencing the use of virtual simulations by science teachers in secondary education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00049-6

Bueno-Baquero, A., González-Calero, J. A., Del Olmo-Muñoz, J., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. C. (2026). Bridging digital transitions: Teacher digital competence across primary and secondary education. Education and Information Technologies, 31, 3097–3124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13944-y

Cao, L., Hennessy, S., & Wegerif, R. (2025). Thinking fast, slow, and ahead: Enhancing in-service teacher contingent responsiveness in science discussion with mixed-reality simulation. Computers & Education, 237, 105389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105389

Chen, C.-H., Fei, H.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2026). Hierarchical analysis of in-service teachers’ barriers to technology-integrated instruction: A review of 2000–2024 publications. Computers & Education, 242, 105509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105509

Chen, F., & Chen, G. (2026). How a technology-augmented inquiry approach affects teacher practice and student learning in disadvantaged science classrooms. Instructional Science, 54(37). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09788-1

Chen, F., Zhang, Y., & Chen, G. (2025). Exploring the effects of technology-supported collaborative inquiry and students’ ICT competency on scientific literacy and subject knowledge in rural science classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 18705–18732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13512-w

Cheng, Y.-C., Lin, H.-C., Chen, K.-J., Cheng, Y.-T., & Lin, C.-T. (2025). Bridging knowledge and intention: The impact of teachers’ TPACK on online teaching self-efficacy, attitudes, and behavioral intentions—An empirical research of Taiwanese high school teachers. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105408

Dockendorff, M., Merino, R., & Gomez Zaccarelli, F. (2026). Challenges to using digital technologies in mathematics teaching and learning: The view of Chilean teacher educators. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1795323. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1795323

Fior, G., Fonda, C., & Canessa, E. (2025). Hands-on STEM learning experiences using digital technologies. STEM Education, 5(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025009

Gudergan, S. P., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2025). Special issue editorial: Advanced partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) applications in business research. Journal of Business Research, 188, 115087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115087

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hu, X., Xu, W., Wan, Z., Liu, M., & Xu, W. (2025). Bridging self-efficacy and digital competence: A comprehensive scoping review of teachers’ readiness for the digital age. SAGE Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363716

Ilma, A. Z., & Kuswanto, H. (2025). Toward student’s scientific literacy in science learning: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 22(2), 020222. https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFisE.22.020222

Kapici, H. O. (2025). Does inquiry-based learning work better in regular classrooms or computer-based settings? Instructional Science, 53, 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09711-0

Koç, A., & Kanadlı, S. (2025). Effect of interactive learning environments on learning outcomes in science education: A network meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34, 681–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10202-7

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131

Laius, A., & Orgusaar, G. (2025). The critical role of science teachers’ readiness in the integration of digital tools and materials in science education. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081001

Mavenge, L., Ncanywa, T., Dyantyi-Gwanya, N., & Asaleye, A. J. (2026). Integrating TPACK in online pedagogies: Effects on science postgraduate students’ competence. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1751227. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1751227

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Niu, H., & Niranjan, M. R. R. (2025). Teacher digital competence in New Zealand primary schools: A qualitative study of integration practices, challenges, and cultural considerations. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52, 4611–4632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00912-7

Pérez Morán, G., Amaya Sauceda, R. A., Arhuis-Inca, W., Tamayo Ly, C. C., & Valverde Quispe, B. M. (2026). Digital competence and learning strategies in preschool teachers in Peru. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1686920. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1686920

Poser, J., Harms, U., Schönle, D., Reich, C., & Fiedler, D. (2026). Pre-service science teachers’ judgment accuracy across science competencies: Evidence from a digital classroom simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 63(7), 626-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70064

Shambare, B., & Jita, T. (2025). A new era of learning: Exploring science teachers’ perceptions of virtual lab in rural schools. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15185–15205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13412-z

Sibley, L., Fabian, A., Plicht, C., Pagano, L., Ehrhardt, N., Wellert, L., Bohl, T., & Lachner, A. (2025). Adaptive teaching with technology enhances lasting learning. Learning and Instruction, 99, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102141

Uçar, M. B., & Sahin, E. (2026). Science teachers’ technology integration through TPACK-P: Proficiency and component interactions. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10331-7

Yeh, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2026). High school students’ fully online science learning barriers during the pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 35, 823–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10283-4

Zhang, Y., & Li, C. (2025). Leveraging pedagogical knowledge for effective technology integration in education: A research-based approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 130, 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102553

Zhang, Y., Pang, S., & Jiang, R. (2026). Integrating digital tools into the DMCR framework to enhance upper-primary students’ scientific reasoning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10346-0

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

How to Cite

Plasencia-Mariños, Y., Esteves-Saldana, T., Reynoso-Arcos, S., Cifuentes-La Rosa, C., Suasnabar-Ugarte, F., & Illa-Sihuincha, G. (2026). Digital tools and scientific competencies: A predictive model using PLS-SEM. InveCom Journal, 6(Especial 3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23608222