1
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Assessing farmers’ management skills and social participation as
part of the planning process and decision-making
Evaluando las habilidades de gestión de los agricultores y su
participación social como parte del proceso de planificación y toma
de decisiones
David Gortaire Díaz
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-7305
dgortaire@utb.edu.ec
Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo.
Babahoyo - Ecuador
Julio Mora Aristega
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-9179
jmora@utb.edu.ec
Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo.
Babahoyo - Ecuador
Reyes Calderón Angulo
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8944-8375
recladerona010@utb.edu.ec
Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo.
Babahoyo Ecuador
Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva
ycarbo@utb.edu.ec
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1385-0659
Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo.
Babahoyo - Ecuador
2
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze farmers' management skills and their participation in the decision-
making process in their institutions. A total of 130 farmers were surveyed using a
questionnaire, focusing on different variables in productive, social and economic areas. A
descriptive statistical analysis was used to explain the main evidence. As a result, outstanding
farmers' skills for management and participation in agricultural institutions and the
community were identified, supporting the decision-making process and strategic planning,
regardless of their socio-economic status.
Keywords: management, decision-making, social participation.
Recibido: 25-10-23 - Aceptado: 18-12-23
RESUMEN
Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las habilidades de gestión de los agricultores y su
participación en el proceso de toma de decisiones en sus instituciones. Se encuestó a 130
agricultores utilizando un cuestionario, centrándose en diferentes variables en las áreas
productivas, sociales y económicas. Se utilizó un análisis descriptivo estadístico para explicar
la principal evidencia. Como resultado, se identificaron habilidades destacadas de los
agricultores para la gestión y participación en las instituciones agrícolas y la comunidad, lo
que respalda el proceso de toma de decisiones y la planificación estratégica,
independientemente de su situación socioeconómica.
Palabras clave: Administración, toma de decisiones, participación social.
INTRODUCTION
The participation of farmers is a vital factor for the success of environmental conservation
and rehabilitation because they possess skills, technical knowledge, and organizational
capacity to manage natural resources, which has allowed them to live for millennia (IICA,
2018).
Participation is essential to get the rural population involved in the collection of information
and the planning process. Participatory methods can be used to collect information on the
activities and constraints of male and female farmers. This information can then be shared
with policymakers and planners to formulate development plans that consider the interests
of the rural population and promote sustainable development (Stroparo & Floriani, 2023).
Social participation is a cyclical, ascending, dynamic, complex, and articulated process in
which its members organize to share responsibilities. Social participation is a process of
3
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
involving individuals in commitment, cooperation, responsibility, and decision-making to
achieve common goals (Carapia, 2003).
High-quality results require a good process. The idea of a process is basic for decision-
making. One of the most remarkable discoveries of business thinkers from several decades
ago is critical to effective results (Mata-García & Zepeda-Moreno, 2022). Being smart or
working hard does not ensure the quality or quantity of the result. In the absence of an
effective process, the result would be a matter of luck. On the other hand, if there is an
adequate process, the quality will improve. By adopting an effective process and training the
people, results can be improved (Grant et al., 2011).
The main hypothesis of this article is to determine whether farmers have adequate
management skills to participate in the decision-making process. This study is divided into
four main chapters: i) the study case introduction containing the conceptual model and
justification, ii) the literature review iii) the methods used for collecting data and analysis,
and, iv) the results, discussion, and conclusions.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Hansen (1996) defined an agricultural producer as a “natural or legal person who habitually
has the agricultural exploitation of the land as the main economic activity”. According to
FAO (2009), the agricultural producer is the civil or legal person who makes the main
decisions on the use of resources and exercises control over the administration of the
operations of the farm. You have technical and financial responsibilities and can directly
assume them or delegate those related to daily work to a hired manager.
Agricultural communities, on the other hand, it is considered a relatively new socio-economic
model of food production and of organizing distribution and sales, aiming to increase the
quality of food and the care given to land, plants, and animals - while substantially reducing
waste of food and financial risks for producers (Huambachano, 2019). The decision-making
process in agricultural plantations depends on different situations since their main source of
income and in some cases, food depends on the crops that are grown, which is why farmers
usually have to make many decisions regarding their crops and in other cases to the same
producers (FAO, 2017; Sanabria Ramos, 2001).
4
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Social participation is described as “the social processes through which groups,
organizations, institutions or different sectors (all social actors including the community),
intervene in the identification of related problems and come together in an alliance to design,
implement and evaluate the solutions” (Sanabria Ramos, 2001). In a community process,
citizen participation is the key element, but this participation implies that it is the citizens
themselves who decide how they want their future to be (both the most immediate and the
most distant) (Oteros-Rozas et al., 2019).
Therefore, in the population space, decisions are made, by consensus, on what are the
priorities to be worked on based on the plan. Moreover, the acceleration of development
plans and projects requires adequate economic and financial resources, natural, and
technological, planning, the improvement of the administration, structural reforms (tax,
agrarian), and the conscious and organized participation of the population (Ostrom & Ahn,
2003). The active or passive, positive or negative role that the population plays in the
formulation of plans and projects constitutes an accelerator or a brake. Consequently, without
diminishing the importance of other resources, popular participation is essential for
development (Alarcón Conde & Álvarez Rodríguez, 2020).
Therefore, Narayan and Cassidy (2001) good plans can be drawn up with adequate financing
and technical resources; however, these may fail due to a lack of decision and the willingness
of the population to put them into practice. Then, it is imperative to i) Interpret social reality,
that the population understands them and makes them their own and that they put them into
practice and, ii) The population is the one that must conceive, execute, and take advantage
of the benefits of the plans.
On the other hand, social participation in agriculture is a path to achieve sustainability, which
mostly focuses on the ability to develop lifestyles and levels of consumption orientated to the
preservation of the resource's stocks. It is characterized by an approach oriented to the
conservation of resources and the fulfillment of the present generations' needs without
compromising future generations (Borrelli, 2016).
5
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
METHODS
The study case took place in Los Rios Ecuador. The research is predominantly descriptive
with the objective of supporting the central hypothesis presented in this article. Quantitative
tools were used to gather data and present the main results.
A semi-structured questionnaire was used as a survey to obtain information about farmers’
situation. The survey was conducted in the households of participants after they agreed on
written consent. This data was obtained from a study conducted among the agriculture
producers in the whole province of Los Rios. The sample was determined using a
probabilistic simple random sampling. The survey's primary purpose was to investigate
attitudes towards the production activity, farmers’ characteristics (demographics), and
management skills, 136 valid questionnaires were obtained, which were carried out randomly
in 10 different cities of Los Rios.
The questionnaire had questions regarding the main indicators which are:
Table 1: Indicators for Evaluation
To analyze the data, we used three different methods for each one of the three core indicators.
Descriptive statistics helped to study the food security indicators using tables, describing the
primary information to explain appropriately the results obtained from collected data in the
field. We constructed an amoeba graph in order to determine the level of social participation
regarding different indexes. We also used colors to identify the risk level according to the
Indicators
Measure
Description
Management Skills:
Extension Services
Management
Training
Accounting Records
Availability of carry an adequate
management coming from
external methods or self-
preparation.
Social Participation:
Associativity
Benefits equity
Decision Making
Evaluate social participation
regarding associativity, work in
projects, equality and decision
making.
6
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
sustainability model proposed by Sepúlveda (2008), where: red = high level, orange = critic
level, yellow = unstable risk, blue = stable level, and, green = adequate level.
Finally, the study territory is Los Rios province, which is one of the 24 provinces of Ecuador,
located in the coastal region of the country. Its total population is 527,559 people, and its
capital is Babahoyo (Naranjo, 2004). In this province, water is a valuable resource, water
bathes its lands and makes it the most fertile area in Ecuador, and it is from that it gets its
name (Los Rios in Spanish means Rivers). The study collected data in 10 different cities of
the province, where a convenience sample was reached in each one of the cities surveyed,
reaching 78 rural communities, between parishes and precincts, where most small-scale
agricultural producers are; better presented in the following Figure 1:
Figure 1: Sample and communities in Los Rios
RESULTS
The results show a quantitative and qualitative analysis using descriptive statistics to explain
the results obtained from the study population. Initially, Table 2 details the main products
that were mentioned by small-scale producers, indicating the products destined to sale and
self-consumption, products harvested in gardens, and minor products harvested. The
7
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
surveyed producers own approximately from 1 to 15 hectares, with an average of 6.02
hectares, where they develop their production activities.
Table 2: Los Rios main products’ harvest and destination
Mainly sale
destined
Mainly self-
consumption destined
Harvested in family
gardens
Rice
58%
Orange
18%
Peppermint
6%
Oregano
4%
Cocoa
35%
Watermelon
17%
Pumpkin
5%
Passionfruit
4%
Maize
25%
Lemon
14%
Yucca
5%
Soursop
3%
Banana
19%
Mango
13%
Lemongrass
5%
Coconut
3%
Plantain
12%
Melon
8%
Beans
4%
Tangerine
3%
Soy
8%
Papaya
8%
Coriander
4%
Cherry
3%
Sugar cane
4%
Guava
8%
Aloe
3%
Tomato
3%
Within its production, Los Ríos farmers mainly grow rice, cocoa, and corn. In addition to the
products mentioned in Table 1, it was also mentioned to have family gardens and small farms,
in which fruit, vegetables, and herbs products are harvested. Table 2 presents the product
species studying the mentioned crops as primary, secondary, and additional products and,
they harvest approximately 79 products supporting the biodiversity and the food security in
small-scale producers’ families.
We present the top relevant crops and their destination, i) mainly destined for sale such as
rice, cocoa, and corn; ii) destined for home consumption, mainly fruit species such as orange,
watermelon, and mango; iii) grown in family gardens, rich in plant and herbal species and
iv) smaller species such as oregano, passion fruit or coconut. Species diversification supports
adequate consumption and contributes to the nutrition of farmers, in turn improving the well-
being of the community and the health and safety of its inhabitants (Kennedy, Ballard, &
Dop, 2011).
Instead, Table 3, collected information about the producers’ income, analyzing different
categories that represent: i) poverty line, ii) minimum wage, iii) basic basket of goods, iv)
medium income, and v) higher incomes. In Table 4, we aimed to analyze the percentage of
8
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
producers that could access extension services, training, and accounting management,
according to each income construct.
Table 3: Accounting management according to family income
Income Interval
Extension
Services
(Yes = 27.8%)
Technology
Training
(Yes = 28.8%)
Accounting
Records
(Yes = 71.0%)
$1.00 $85
29,41%
11,76%
58,82%
$85.00 - $400.00
31,25%
26,56%
75,00%
$400.00 - $714.00
20,69%
31,03%
72,41%
$714.00 - $1000.00
18,75%
25,00%
50,00%
Higher than $1000.00
42,86%
85,71%
85,71%
The extension service to small-scale producers in Los Ríos is limited, both from the public
sector and academia. Farmers who declare income of more than $1000, have obtained
extension services in 42.85%, for the rest of the groups, the percentages of producers do not
exceed 31.26%. On the other hand, small producers declare that less than 31.03% have
received training related to technology, social networks, and the Internet, in the case of the
group with the highest income, 85.71% declare knowledge. While more than 50% keep
records of income and expenses to control their production, even those who are in the poverty
line, where 58.82% declare having income and expense records, evidencing that accounting
is not an issue of income, any economic level in farming has the possibility of carrying
accounting of incomes and expenses, even when they have limited extension services and
training.
Then, it is imperative to measure the accounting management criteria according to the level
of education. Table 4 synthesizes this information, where producers indicated only 27.8%
could access extension services coming from public institutions or academies, and 28.8% of
farmers are trained in technology services. However, 71% of the surveyed producers keep
records of accounts and finances to control their income and expenses, sometimes, in not
formal methods, but they make their effort to have control.
9
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
The extension services are variable in every level of education, and it doesn’t have a linear
behavior of increasing, while training increases according to the level of education. Only
11.1% of farmers are trained when they have incomplete school, those values are increasing,
and further college education has higher values, from 61% to 100%. Finally, farmers keep
records independently of their level of studies. More than 55% of the farmers in each
construct keep accounting records, in both, formal and informal methods.
Table 4: Accounting management according to family income
Education Level
Extension
Services
(Yes =
27.8%)
Technology
Training
(Yes = 28.8%)
Accounting
Records
(Yes = 71.0%)
Incomplete School
33,3%
11,1%
88,9%
Complete School
25,0%
13,9%
65,7%
Incomplete High School
23,8%
23,8%
55,0%
Complete High School
29,0%
36,7%
80,6%
Incomplete College
14,3%
64,3%
78,6%
Complete College
50,0%
61,7%
66,7%
Post-graduate Program
0,0%
100,0%
100,0%
On the other hand, we developed an amoeba graph to assess social participation. Initially, we
noticed that only 35.2% of farmers in Los Rios belong to an agricultural association or
cooperative, this is such a reduced quantity of producers that work together to create better
opportunities. From this percentage of farmers, we evaluated how the participation is carried
out according to the surveyed producers’ answers. Figure 2 presents the graph where we
considered the main 11 indexes to explain the social participation in this province and also
Table 5 gathered this information.
10
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Table 5: Indexes of Social Participation
Indicator
Name
Index
Planning Meetings
SP1
0,79
Equally participation in decision
making
SP2
0,75
Clear Rules and Standards
SP3
0,74
Household benefits
SP4
0,66
Equity in sharing benefits
SP5
0,71
Gender equality
SP6
0,79
Female legal members
SP7
0,82
Equally Socieconomic level
SP8
0,61
Create projects
SP9
0,58
Paritipating in projects decisions
SP10
0,72
Community decision making
SP11
0,67
Integrated Index
0,71
According to farmers' answers, we can indicate that most of the indexes are at a stable level,
and then support the participation process (when they are part of an association). Then, the
associations call to farmers to adequate meetings to plan their processes (0.79), and they
indicated they have equal participation in the decision-making process (0.75), which is
mostly the main hypothesis of this article. On the other hand, associations presented clear
rules and standards to carry on the operations (0.74), and they could get equal benefits from
the associations (0.71 and 0.66) and projects coming from it. Producers also indicated there
is equality in socioeconomic level (0.61) and gender (0.79), having female farmers as legal
members as the only adequate level in the study (0.82). Associations are failing according to
the producers in project creations (0.58) according to Agricultural activities or any other
producing activity where they can participate, being this index unstable, but they can
participate in the projects’ decision-making (0.72) when they have them. Finally, they could
participate also in community decision-making (0.67), but the level is minor to other indexes.
11
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Figure 2: Built-in Indexes of Social Participation
Elaborated by the authors
In the amoeba graph in Figure 2, we integrated the indexes to look up the level of participation
as a whole. As we mentioned before. in the figure we can see a stable level of social
participation, close to the edge, the exceptions are SP8 and SP9, where farmers consider all
the members of the association to have equal economic levels and the association’s ability to
create projects. However, having reviewed the management skills and extension services
they received, they have a well-managed process, allowing people to participate in the
decision-making and focusing on generating a “be part” feeling for the farmers.
DISCUSSION
The participation of families in gardens is one of the factors that can increase food diversity
(Gutiérrez, 2012); it is also considered the engine for community development from an
agroecological approach since it is the foundation for sustainable agriculture (Altieri et al.,
2011).
The main objective of this study was to determine that regardless of socioeconomic factors,
agricultural producers can participate in decision-making since their knowledge is useful and
0,00
0,10
0,20
0,30
0,40
0,50
0,60
0,70
0,80
0,90
SP1
SP2
SP3
SP4
SP5
SP6SP7
SP8
SP9
SP10
SP11
12
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
considerable for their production activities. Given the results obtained, the results determined
that participation is important and is well-managed between associated producers of Los
Ríos.
Participation is not only achieved through contact with farmers, but on the contrary, it is one
of the activities that require the most continuity and consistency in an area, because
participation is also a degree of trust, communication between producers, and degree of
confidence that will vary in reaching according to regional ethnic peculiarities (Oteros-Rozas
et al., 2019).
Moreover, a stable level of social participation could guarantee farmers better offers in the
productive sphere and with society. We can see important information in the document about
how participation in the agricultural sectors of the province of Los Ríos is managed, and its
analysis provides relevant information to be considered from the perspective of farmers,
regardless of their socioeconomic level.
One of the limitations of this study is that the survey did not include all the cantons of Los
Ríos. This can be a point for improvement. Anyhow, the arguments have high validity due
to the number of responses, which allowed us to validate the information. Finally, this
research provides a striking and innovative vision; it represents the first step to documenting
part of the dietary diversity and livelihoods in the rural populations of Ecuador.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the exploratory nature of this research, it is clear that in the rural areas of the Los
Ríos province at the level, it has a stable participation level in their associations and
community. Our research supported the hypothesis of this study: Agricultural producers of
Los Rios have an appropriate stable level of participation in the decision-making process
even when their capabilities are not the best, due to the lack of extension services and the
demographic conditions as income and academic level.
According to the results of the surveys, it was possible to determine that both men and women
have high participation and are part of decision-making within the association and the
community to which they belong, although most women expressed doubts about their power
to decision within the association that they integrate, it was evidenced women could access
13
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
legally to the associations and they can participate into the planning and decision-making
process (FAO, 2017).
Regarding our research question, it is determined that by the criteria of the respondents,
participation in associations is important regardless of their socioeconomic level and their
intervention positively influences decision-making in resource management and the actions
they have an impact on the development of communities. Future research could be essential
to study better ways of accessing local markets, i.e., on the organic production side, through
third-party certifications or Participatory Guarantee Systems (Cuéllar-Padilla, 2010;
INFOAM, 2013; Meemken & Qaim, 2018; Pino, 2017), to increase participation in small-
scale producers.
REFERENCES
Alarcón Conde, M. Á., & Álvarez Rodríguez, J. F. (2020). El Balance Social y las relaciones
entre los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y los Principios Cooperativos mediante
un Análisis de Redes Sociales.
Altieri, M., Funes-Monzote, F., & Petersen, P. (2011). Agroecologically efficient agricultural
systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty. In Agronomy for
Sustainable Development (Vol. 32). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0065-6
Borrelli, I. P. (2016). Territorial Sustainability and Multifunctional Agriculture: A Case
Study. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 467474.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.046
Carapia, J. del C. C. (2003). La participación social: retos y perspectivas (Vol. 1). Plaza y
Valdés.
Cuéllar-Padilla, M. (2010). La certificación ecológica como instrumento de revalorización
de lo local: los Sistemas Participativos de Garantía en Andalucía.
FAO. (2009). Glossary On Organic Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations2. Glossary On Organic Agriculture%0A
FAO. (2017). Marco Nacional de Prioridades para la Asistencia Técnica de la FAO en
Ecuador. 2013-2017.
14
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Grant, M., Buchanan, G., Sim, I., Wilson, J., Pearce‐Higgins, J. W., & Redpath, S. (2011).
Exploring the relationships between wader declines and current land‐use in the British
uplands AU - Amar, Arjun. Bird Study, 58(1), 1326.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2010.513412
Gutiérrez, C. (2012). La Abundancia : Proyecto Cooperativo para la Agricultura Familiar
Agroecológica. FAO.
Hansen, J. W. (1996). Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems,
50(2), 117143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S
Huambachano, M. A. (2019). Traditional ecological knowledge and indigenous foodways in
the Andes of Peru. Review of International American Studies, 12(1), 87110.
IICA (Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura). (2018). Protocolos
estandarizados para la valorización de frutos nativos del PROCISUR frente a la
creciente demanda por ingredientes y aditivos especializados (carotenoides,
antocianinas y polifenoles).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327848592_IICA_2018_Protocolos_estand
arizados_para_la_valorizacion_de_frutos_nativos_del_PROCISUR_frente_a_la_creci
ente_demanda_por_ingredientes_y_aditivos_especializados_carotenoides_antocianin
as_y_polifenoles/citations
INFOAM. (2013). Sistemas Participativos de Garantía. Diálogos Textos Breves Sobre
Desarrollo Rural, 153.
Mata-García, B., & Zepeda-Moreno, M.-E. (2022). Los peligros del conectivismo.
Presupuestos metodológicos para una pedagogía interterritorial para los pueblos
rurales. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 119134.
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2022.37.1307
Meemken, E.-M., & Qaim, M. (2018). Can private food standards promote gender equality
in the small farm sector? Journal of Rural Studies, 58, 3951.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.030
Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M. F. (2001). A Dimensional Approach To Measuring Social
Capital: Development And Validation Of A Social Capital Inventory. Current
Sociology, 49(2), 59102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049002006
15
REVISTA INVECOM “Estudios transdisciplinarios en comunicación y sociedad” / ISSN 2739-0063 /
www.revistainvecom.org. Vol. 4, # 2, 2024. Licencia CC BY. Assessing farmers management skills and social
participation as part of the planning process and decision-making. David Gortaire Díaz, Julio Mora Aristega, Reyes
Calderón Angulo y Yanina del Rocío Carbo Silva.
Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2003). Una perspectiva del capital social desde las ciencias
sociales: capital social y acciÃ\textthreesuperiorn colectiva. Revista Mexicana de
SociologÃ\-a, 65, 155233.
http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-
25032003000100005&nrm=iso
Oteros-Rozas, E., Ravera, F., & García-Llorente, M. (2019). How does agroecology
contribute to the transitions towards social-ecological sustainability? In Sustainability
(Vol. 11, Issue 16, p. 4372). MDPI.
Pino, M. (2017). Los Sistemas Participativos de Garantía en el Ecuador. Aproximaciones a
su desarrollo. Letras Verdes, 22, 120145.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.22.2017.2679
Sanabria Ramos, G. (2001). Participación social y comunitaria.Reflexiones. Revista Cubana
de Salud Pública, 27(2), 8995. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21427202
Stroparo, T. R., & Floriani, N. (2023). Sistemas participativos de certificação: inovação
social, ecoinovação ou desterritorialização? Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA), 13(38),
325341.